Tenders

Invitation to Tender for the provision of Trinity Primary School - Roofing Replacement Works

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
011104-2026
Value
£582,000
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£582,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire
Type
Other
60
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Herefordshire Council wishes to appoint a contractor to carry out roofing replacement works at Trinity Primary School, involving the replacement of roofing systems, rooflights, and ceilings.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-03-06T12:00:00+00:00.
--Access and review the full tender documentation, including evaluation criteria, available on the Supplying the Southwest Portal.
--Prepare a comprehensive bid addressing the project scope, which includes replacing the current failed roofing system to three areas, replacing existing rooflights, and ceiling replacement, for an estimated contract value of 582000 EUR and a contract duration of 3 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries. Bidders must consult the full tender documentation on the Supplying the Southwest Portal for specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries. Bidders must consult the full tender documentation on the Supplying the Southwest Portal for specific eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Possess the necessary expertise and resources to carry out roofing replacement works at Trinity Primary School, including replacing the current failed roofing system in three areas.
--Possess the necessary expertise and resources to replace existing rooflights.
--Possess the necessary expertise and resources to carry out ceiling replacement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries. Bidders must consult the full tender documentation on the Supplying the Southwest Portal for specific financial requirements, such as minimum turnover, financial stability criteria, or required insurances.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
011104-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS Record provides official structured data about Herefordshire Council's open tender for roofing replacement works at Trinity Primary School, detailing buyer information and tender identification.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011104-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the tender for roofing replacement works at Trinity Primary School by Herefordshire Council, including buyer information and tender specifics.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011104-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice from Herefordshire Council inviting contractors to bid for roofing replacement works at Trinity Primary School, detailing the project scope, estimated value, key dates, and evaluation criteria, with full documentation available on the Supplying the Southwest Portal.

Tender NoticeHTM
011104-2026.html

Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

60
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides clear project scope and basic information but suffers from significant gaps in detailing specific requirements and evaluation criteria, which are crucial for transparent and fair competition. The reliance on an external portal for essential details and the lack of e-submission are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The procedure type, CPV code, and submission deadline are clearly defined and appear reasonable for a below-threshold open competition. No disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the immediate disclosure of all mandatory details (e.g., specific exclusion/eligibility criteria) in the provided summary is incomplete, requiring external portal access.

Mandatory disclosure requirements for specific criteria are not met in the provided summary.
Missing 'Liable Person' and codes for Type/Procedure.
Clarity55/100

The project description is clear and unambiguous. However, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state that specific eligibility, technical, financial, and evaluation criteria are not detailed in the summaries, requiring bidders to consult an external portal. This significantly reduces the clarity of the tender information provided.

Specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are not detailed.
Evaluation criteria are not specified, hindering understanding of assessment methods.
Completeness60/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete regarding the specific content of eligibility, technical, financial, and exclusion requirements, and critically, the evaluation criteria are missing from the provided summaries.

Specific requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, exclusion) are not defined in the provided content.
Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as missing.
Fairness50/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is reasonable for preparation. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive proposals fairly. The lack of e-submission is also a minor fairness drawback.

Evaluation criteria are not specified, compromising transparency and objectivity.
No electronic submission support, potentially limiting equal access.
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While the 'Supplying the Southwest Portal' is mentioned for documentation, a direct URL is not provided in the given text. The automated check indicates no electronic submission support, which is a practical drawback in modern procurement.

No electronic submission support.
Direct URL for tender documents not explicitly provided in the summary.
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no disputes or suspensions. However, there is an inconsistency where the 'Official PDF Version' summary mentions detailing 'evaluation criteria,' but the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' explicitly state they are 'Not explicitly detailed.' Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are also empty.

Contradiction regarding the presence of evaluation criteria between document summaries.
Empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for Type/Procedure.
Sustainability20/100

The tender information provided does not include any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, representing a missed opportunity to incorporate modern sustainability standards.

No green procurement criteria.
No social aspects included.

Strengths

Clear project description and scope.
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified.
CPV code is correctly assigned and procedure type is defined.
No disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable process.
Reasonable submission deadline for preparation.

Concerns

Critical lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and exclusion requirements in the provided summary.
Evaluation criteria are not specified, hindering transparency and fair bidding.
Inconsistency between PDF summary and AI-extracted requirements regarding evaluation criteria.
No electronic submission support.
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all specific requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, exclusion) and detailed evaluation criteria are explicitly included in the primary tender documentation for full transparency.
2. Implement electronic submission capabilities to enhance practicality and equal access for bidders.
3. Integrate sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where appropriate to align with modern procurement best practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline