Legal Compliance65/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and no disputes are noted. However, the explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds is missing from the provided text, and full legal documentation requires access to an external portal, which slightly reduces transparency and direct compliance verification.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
•Full legal documentation requires access to an external portal (www.The-Chest.org).
Clarity55/100
The service description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Completeness60/100
Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are adequately provided. While documents are listed, their full content and crucial details like evaluation criteria are missing from the provided information, requiring external access and leaving a significant gap in the tender's completeness.
•Evaluation criteria are not defined.
•Full tender documents and details are only accessible via an external portal.
Fairness35/100
The absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impacts the transparency and objectivity of the tender process. Furthermore, requirements for 'Good working knowledge of Tameside' and 'Good working knowledge of the third sector in Tameside' are highly specific and strongly suggest tailoring to local incumbents, which significantly limits competition and equal access for all potential bidders.
•Evaluation criteria are not specified, hindering transparency and objectivity.
•Requirements for specific local knowledge (Tameside population, community assets, third sector) are highly restrictive and appear tailored, potentially limiting competition.
Practicality80/100
The tender supports electronic submission via the specified portal (www.The-Chest.org), provides a clear document URL, and specifies the contract start date, duration, and estimated value. These elements contribute to good practicality for potential bidders.
Data Consistency90/100
All key fields are populated, there are no reported suspensions or disputes, and dates are logical and consistent. The data provided is reliable and well-structured.
Sustainability70/100
The core service, 'Community Navigation' or 'Social Prescribing,' is inherently focused on social wellbeing, community integration, and preventative health, demonstrating a strong social sustainability aspect. While explicit green procurement or innovation focuses are not detailed, the nature of the service itself aligns with social objectives.
•No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
•No explicit focus on innovation beyond the service's 'new' nature.