Re-tender for the purchase of an operating table

This tender provides clear basic information and reasonable deadlines, but critical restricted document access prevents bidders from fully understanding the requirements and evaluation criteria. There are also inconsistencies regarding e-submission and a complete lack of sustainability considerations.

The tender defines the procedure type as open, provides a relevant CPV code, and has a reasonable submission deadline. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the restricted access to the 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' document poses a risk to full legal compliance verification and transparency.

High-level requirement categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are listed, but detailed requirements and performance conditions are not readily available due to restricted document access. The contradiction regarding evaluation criteria (mentioned in one summary, flagged as missing in issues) further reduces clarity.

While basic information such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are present, the critical 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' document has no content extracted and is flagged as having restricted access. This renders the tender significantly incomplete from a bidder's perspective, as essential details are missing or inaccessible.

The restricted document access for the 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' is a major impediment to fairness, as it prevents all bidders from having equal access to essential information. The ambiguity surrounding the evaluation criteria further compromises transparency and equal opportunity. No explicit tailoring of requirements was identified, but restricted access prevents full verification.

There is a direct contradiction between the 'Characteristics: E-Procurement' field and the 'AUTOMATED CHECK RESULTS' stating 'No e-submission', which creates confusion. The contract start date is not specified, only the duration. A direct public URL for documents is not explicitly provided.

The most significant inconsistency lies in the conflicting information regarding e-submission support. Other key fields are generally populated and dates are logical. The CPV code '0 (33000000)' has a minor formatting inconsistency.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.