Vaccination Voucher Program Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B

This tender presents a clear service description and well-defined technical requirements but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and estimated contract value, significantly impacting fairness and transparency. The lack of e-submission and sustainability considerations further detracts from its overall quality.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and there are no disputes. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance issue, as it undermines the principles of transparency and equal treatment in public procurement.

The service description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and understandable. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely impacts the clarity for potential bidders, making it impossible to understand how proposals will be assessed.

While basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed and classified estimated contract value and the absence of evaluation criteria. These are fundamental omissions for a comprehensive tender.

Full document access is provided, but fairness is severely compromised by the undisclosed contract value and, most critically, the absence of objective evaluation criteria. This creates a risk of arbitrary decision-making. The lack of e-submission also reduces equal access for all potential bidders.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical hurdle in modern procurement. Furthermore, the undisclosed contract value makes it difficult for bidders to prepare a practical and financially sound proposal.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include empty 'Liable Person' and procedure 'Code' fields, and the missing estimated value, but overall data consistency is good.

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often encourages higher sustainability standards. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations.