Supply of Bacterial Gene Detection and Sequencing

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and an identified focus on social value, but it suffers from a lack of detailed evaluation criteria and the absence of electronic submission.

The tender clearly defines its procedure type and CPV codes, and shows no disputes. While the reveal date is missing, the submission deadline is clearly stated, and the tender appears to comply with national procurement regulations.

The tender's purpose and basic requirements are clearly articulated, and categories for award criteria (technical quality, price, social value) are identified. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria (e.g., weightings) and specific performance conditions in the summaries could lead to ambiguity.

All essential administrative and financial information, including key dates, value, and location, is provided, and documents are available. However, specific mandatory exclusion grounds and the full breakdown of evaluation criteria are not detailed in the summaries.

The tender demonstrates good fairness by disclosing the estimated value and providing access to documents. Requirements appear generic, not tailored. While the lack of detailed evaluation criteria reduces full transparency, it does not suggest unfair tailoring.

Key contract dates and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical impediment in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

Core data points such as title, reference, organization, value, and key dates are consistently populated and logical. Minor gaps exist in administrative fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes.

The tender positively incorporates social value as an award criterion. However, it lacks explicit focus on environmental (green procurement) or innovation aspects, which limits its overall sustainability profile.