Legal Compliance70/100
The tender is for a Preliminary Market Engagement (PME), which is a pre-procurement stage. While deadlines are reasonable for a PME, the explicit 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' are concerning for a public notice. The estimated value is classified, and the reveal date is missing, impacting full disclosure. However, CPV codes are correctly assigned, and there are no disputes.
•Missing formal procedure type and status
•Estimated value classified
Clarity85/100
The description of services for both Lot 1 and Lot 2 is exceptionally detailed, clear, and unambiguous, outlining purpose, scope, assets, maintenance activities, reporting, and compliance. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-defined. The primary clarity issue is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is crucial for future tender stages.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness75/100
The tender provides most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, contract duration, and start date. Requirements are extensively detailed. However, the absence of a defined procedure type, the classified estimated value, and the lack of evaluation criteria represent significant gaps in overall completeness.
•Missing formal procedure type
•Estimated value classified
Fairness65/100
Full document access is provided, and the use of an e-procurement platform for the PME questionnaire promotes equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the classified estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly reduce transparency, making it challenging for potential bidders to understand the future competitive landscape and prepare effectively.
•Estimated value classified
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality70/100
Electronic submission for the PME questionnaire is supported via a provided URL, enhancing practicality. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the classified estimated value hinders potential bidders' ability to practically assess the financial scale and resource commitment required for the opportunity.
•Estimated value classified
Data Consistency80/100
Dates are logical and consistent, with no reported suspensions or disputes. Most key fields are populated. However, the explicit 'None' for Type and Procedure, and the classified estimated value, indicate some missing or withheld key data points, slightly impacting overall data consistency.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields
•'Estimated Value' classified
Sustainability85/100
The tender demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainability, explicitly including requirements for efficient servicing, waste reduction, responsible disposal, and the use of low-emission vehicles. Social aspects are also well-integrated through resident engagement and safeguarding requirements. There is no explicit focus on innovation.
•No explicit innovation focus