Legal Compliance75/100
Legal compliance is generally good; the procedure type and CPV code are clear, and there are no disputes. However, the provided text lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, directing bidders to the Bidder Pack for full details, which is a minor gap in immediate transparency.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly stated in provided text
•Financial requirements not explicitly stated in provided text
Clarity55/100
The description of services and technical capabilities is very clear and detailed. However, the most significant issue is the explicit absence of evaluation criteria, which severely impacts the overall clarity of how bids will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Performance conditions not explicitly stated
Completeness60/100
Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and document availability are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided text, requiring reference to the Bidder Pack.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly stated in provided text
Fairness50/100
Document access, value disclosure, and e-procurement are positive aspects. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly undermines the fairness and transparency of the procurement process, as bidders cannot objectively prepare or understand how their proposals will be judged.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality85/100
The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission via a dedicated portal with a clear registration URL. The contract start date and estimated value are known. There is a minor point of clarification needed regarding the 48-month contract duration within an 8-year framework.
•Minor clarification needed for 'Contract Duration: 48 months' within an '8 (eight) year period' framework
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include empty codes for procedure type and a missing liable person. No disputes or suspensions are reported.
•Liable Person field is empty
•Procedure type codes are empty
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social aspects