Tenders

Dynamic Purchasing System For Passenger Transport Services 2023

Open
Deadline
819 days left
May 30, 2028
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
013202-2023
Value
Not disclosed
Location
North Eastern Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

May 09, 2023

Deadline for Questions

May 23, 2028

Submission Deadline

May 30, 2028

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
North Eastern Scotland
Type
Other
66
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Aberdeenshire Council have created a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for the procurement of Passenger Transport Services which shall is expire in May 2028

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Applications to join the DPS must be submitted by 2028-05-30 11:00:00.
--Bidders must access and review the full procurement documents available online for detailed instructions and requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information. Bidders should refer to the full procurement documents for these.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be a legal entity capable of providing passenger transport services.
--Bidders must apply to join the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide passenger transport services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided information. Bidders should refer to the full procurement documents for these.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
013202-2023_official.pdf

Aberdeenshire Council has published a contract notice for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for passenger transport services, open until May 2028, with procurement documents available online.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender notice for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) provides only very basic information, lacking critical details and actual procurement documents. While the DPS model offers flexibility, the absence of comprehensive requirements and evaluation criteria significantly hinders a thorough quality assessment and fair competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The use of a DPS is a legally recognized procurement procedure. However, the provided extract lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and technical capabilities, making it impossible to fully assess legal compliance without the complete tender documentation.

Incomplete information on mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided extract.
Absence of specific financial requirements in the provided extract.
Clarity40/100

Basic information like title, reference, and organization is clear. However, the actual requirements are presented at a very high level, lacking the specificity needed for potential bidders to fully understand the scope and expectations.

Vague technical capability requirement ('demonstrate the capability to provide passenger transport services').
Lack of specific financial requirements.
Completeness75/100

The provided information is critically incomplete. The explicit statement 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)' and 'No document content available' indicates a severe lack of essential tender documentation, including detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, and full terms and conditions.

No tender documents attached or available in the provided information.
Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness60/100

While a DPS generally promotes fairness by allowing continuous entry, the extreme lack of specific requirements and evaluation criteria in the provided extract raises concerns about the objectivity and transparency of the assessment process. This could lead to subjective interpretations.

Lack of specific, objective criteria for technical capability and financial requirements, potentially leading to subjective assessment.
Absence of evaluation criteria makes it difficult to ascertain the fairness of the selection process.
Practicality40/100

The DPS model itself is practical for ongoing service procurement. However, the current information is insufficient for bidders to practically prepare a meaningful application without accessing comprehensive, detailed documents, which are not provided.

Bidders cannot practically prepare an application based solely on the provided extract due to missing critical details.
Automated check indicates 'No e-submission', which could be a practical hurdle if true.
Data Consistency100/100

The limited data provided is largely internally consistent. A minor grammatical error was noted in the description.

Minor grammatical error in the description: 'which shall is expire' instead of 'which shall expire' or 'which is to expire'.
Sustainability0/100

No information regarding green procurement or social criteria is included in the provided extract, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives into the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria specified.
No social criteria specified.

Strengths

Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), promoting flexibility and continuous market access for suppliers.
Clear basic identification information (title, reference, organization, description).
Long contract duration (60 months) offers stability for successful bidders.
CPV code provided for proper classification of services.

Concerns

Critical absence of detailed procurement documents and content, making a comprehensive assessment impossible.
Vague and high-level eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, lacking specificity for bidders.
Missing evaluation criteria, which compromises transparency and fairness of the selection process.
Estimated value not disclosed, hindering bidders' ability to assess commercial viability and resource allocation.
No integration of green procurement or social responsibility criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all comprehensive procurement documents, including detailed specifications, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility criteria, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria, are readily available and clearly linked.
2. Provide a clear estimated value or value range to assist bidders in their decision-making and resource planning.
3. Incorporate specific green procurement and social responsibility criteria to align with modern public procurement best practices and achieve broader public policy objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline