Provision of a Childrens Mental Health & Wellbeing Service

This tender for children's mental health services is generally well-described but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and explicit legal compliance details, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender clearly defines the open procedure and assigns an appropriate CPV code. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information is a significant legal compliance concern. While ESPD is mentioned, these grounds should be clearly referenced or stated. The missing reveal date also introduces uncertainty regarding the reasonableness of the submission period.

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear and unambiguous, detailing the scope, target group, and approach. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and CPV code are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender discloses the estimated value and the requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, promoting fair competition. However, the absence of evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. There is also a contradiction regarding e-submission, which could cause confusion.

Electronic submission is indicated by 'E-Procurement' and ESPD requirement, though contradicted by an automated flag. The contract duration is clear, but a specific start date is not provided. Financing information is limited to the estimated value.

Key fields are mostly populated, and there are no disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. The main inconsistency is the contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check. The description is also duplicated in the 'Additional Info' section.

While the service itself addresses a critical social need, the tender does not explicitly incorporate broader green procurement, additional social criteria beyond the core service, or innovation focus. It is not EU funded.