Tenders

Responsive Repairs, Voids and Multi Trade Project Works Dynamic Purchasing System (iFlair Consortium/West Central Scotland)

Open
Deadline
404 days left
April 12, 2027
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
010567-2023
Value
£42,000,000
Location
Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

April 13, 2023

Deadline for Questions

April 05, 2027

Submission Deadline

April 12, 2027

Budget
£42,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Scotland
Type
Other
70
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Procurement for Housing wish to establish a DPS for the delivery of responsive repairs, voids and multi trade project works for PfH Members throughout West Central Scotland. It is intended that the DPS will run for an initial period of four years with the option to extend for a further period of up to three years. The estimated value is based on the maximum seven-year period. The opportunity has been divided into six categories as follows: 1. Joinery Repairs 2. Electrical Repairs 3. Plumbing Repairs 4. Voids and Multi Trade Work 5. Out of Hours 6. Specialist Works Organisations can apply to become qualified suppliers in one or more lots. iFlair is a consortium of housing associations in Inverclyde, East Renfrewshire and Renfrewshire. It is envisaged that member’s will utilise this DPS for the procurement of contracts to deliver the services defined above based on their individual and/or joint requirements. At the invitation to tender stage PfH Members will define the requirements including tender requirements and specification, delivery model, pricing model and form of contract.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information for this DPS qualification stage.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
010567-2023_official.pdf

Procurement for Housing Ltd (PfH Scotland) is establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System for responsive repairs, voids, and multi-trade project works in West Central Scotland, inviting suppliers to qualify for one or more of six service categories.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for responsive repairs, voids, and multi-trade works, offering flexibility and market access through its category-based structure. However, the complete absence of detailed tender documents and qualification criteria in the provided information significantly hinders transparency and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The establishment of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally valid and flexible procurement tool. While the procedure is listed as "Restricted," the description correctly identifies it as a DPS, which operates more like an open procedure for qualification. The absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary is a notable omission, even if standard grounds are typically applied.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information for this DPS qualification stage.
Clarity40/100

The overall purpose, scope, and categorization of services are clearly outlined. However, the complete lack of any attached documents means that detailed requirements, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria for DPS qualification are entirely missing, leading to significant ambiguity for potential suppliers.

No documents attached
No document content available
Completeness83/100

The provided information is severely incomplete for a tender of this estimated value and complexity. While basic administrative details are present, the absence of any tender documents, detailed qualification requirements, or contractual terms makes it impossible for suppliers to fully understand the opportunity.

No documents attached
No document content available
Fairness80/100

The DPS model inherently promotes fairness by allowing new suppliers to join throughout its duration, and the division into six categories encourages broader market participation, including SMEs. However, the complete lack of detailed qualification criteria in the provided information prevents an assessment of whether the actual requirements will be fair and non-discriminatory.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100

The DPS structure is practical for managing ongoing repair and maintenance needs, offering flexibility for the contracting authority and its members. The categorization of works is also practical for suppliers. However, the current lack of any documentation makes it impractical for suppliers to prepare a meaningful qualification application.

No documents attached
No document content available
Data Consistency100/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is consistent. The description clarifies the DPS nature, addressing the slight discrepancy with the "Restricted procedure" classification.

Sustainability0/100

The provided information contains no details regarding green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate important sustainability objectives into the procurement process.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) promoting market access and flexibility.
Clear division of services into six categories, encouraging SME participation.
Long contract duration with extension option, offering market stability.
Estimated value and scope clearly defined.
Clear description of the procurement's purpose and structure.

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents and detailed qualification requirements.
Missing evaluation criteria for DPS qualification.
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary.
No information on green, social, or innovation criteria.
Missing precise location information (NUTS code).

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed qualification criteria, technical specifications, and contractual terms.
2. Clearly define and publish all mandatory and discretionary exclusion grounds applicable to the DPS qualification.
3. Integrate and clearly communicate sustainability (environmental, social, innovation) criteria into the DPS qualification and subsequent mini-competitions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline