CPC/RB/01/2025 - Software Licences & Associated Services for Academies and Schools

This tender for software licences and services demonstrates good basic structure with clear lot divisions and value disclosure. However, it suffers from significant omissions in critical areas such as evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements, alongside a lack of e-submission and sustainability focus.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and references the Procurement Act 2023. However, the assigned CPV code is too narrow for the scope, and the summary indicates missing mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for legal compliance.

The description of the framework and its lots is clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed performance conditions significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed and what is expected post-award.

While basic information like title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are present, the tender is significantly incomplete regarding crucial details. Mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and especially evaluation criteria are explicitly missing, which are essential for a comprehensive tender package.

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical transparency issue, making it difficult for bidders to understand the assessment process. The lack of e-submission also hinders equal access and efficiency for all potential suppliers.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the most significant practical drawback is the explicit lack of electronic submission support, which is an outdated and inefficient method for a tender of this scale in 2026.

Most key fields are populated, and all dates provided are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions include the 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes, but these do not significantly impact overall data consistency.

The tender completely lacks any mention or integration of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a significant missed opportunity to align with modern public procurement best practices and contribute to broader societal goals.