Development of construction design documentation and performance of construction works for the object "Integration of fire detection and alarm system technical solutions into a unified system for the building at Rīgas iela 77, Līvāni"

The tender outlines a clear scope for fire safety system design and installation but suffers from critical deficiencies due to restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, hindering a comprehensive assessment of its quality and fairness.

The tender mentions mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a standard legal requirement. However, the absence of full tender documents makes it impossible to verify compliance with all public procurement regulations, especially regarding transparency and equal treatment.

The project description and core technical requirements (design, installation, unified system connection, warranty, commissioning) are clearly stated. However, the lack of detailed specifications in accessible documents means the full scope and expectations are not transparent. Vague 'stringent conditions' are mentioned but not detailed.

Basic information and key requirements are listed. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of accessible tender documents, detailed specifications, and evaluation criteria. The estimated value is also missing.

The lack of accessible documents, detailed evaluation criteria, and an estimated value creates significant transparency issues, making it difficult for potential bidders to prepare competitive proposals and raising concerns about equal access to information. The unspecified 'stringent conditions' could also pose fairness issues.

The project scope (design and build for a fire system) is practical. The requirement to ensure site safety while the building remains operational is a practical consideration. However, the absence of full documentation makes it impractical for bidders to accurately assess risks, costs, and prepare a robust proposal.

Based on the limited provided data, there are no apparent inconsistencies. The description aligns with the extracted technical requirements.

No specific sustainability requirements or green procurement aspects are mentioned in the extracted information or automated checks.