Legal Compliance100/100
The tender states adherence to the Procurement Act 2023 and Competitive Flexible Procedure. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, beyond a general reference to 'standard UK procurement regulations,' prevents a thorough assessment of compliance. The lack of actual tender documents is a major impediment to verifying legal adherence.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
•No specific eligibility requirements detailed (e.g., company registration, certifications, financial standing).
Clarity40/100
The description of the service scope, locations, and staffing model (embedded HCPs, peripatetic HCP, PAYG FMEs) is relatively clear within the provided text. However, the absence of full tender documents means crucial details regarding service level agreements, performance indicators, and contractual terms are missing, leading to an overall lack of clarity for potential bidders.
•Lack of detailed service level agreements (SLAs) and performance indicators.
•Absence of full tender documents means contractual terms and conditions are unclear.
Completeness83/100
This is the most significant weakness. The tender information is critically incomplete. Essential documents such as detailed specifications, terms and conditions, evaluation criteria, and submission instructions are entirely missing. The 'EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section provides only a high-level overview, not comprehensive specifications.
•Complete absence of tender documents ('DOCUMENTS (0 total)').
•Missing detailed tender specifications.
Fairness60/100
The lack of detailed eligibility, exclusion, and evaluation criteria, combined with the absence of full tender documents, creates a significant risk to fairness and transparency. Without clear rules, bidders cannot prepare competitive offers, and the contracting authority's assessment process lacks objectivity. While operational requirements are specific, they do not inherently suggest tailoring to a specific company without further context from complete documentation.
•Absence of explicit evaluation criteria compromises transparency and fairness.
•Lack of detailed eligibility and exclusion criteria creates uncertainty for bidders.
Practicality40/100
The operational requirements (24/7/365 embedded service, specific staffing model across multiple sites, PAYG FME) are demanding but appear practical for a service of this nature and scale. However, the absence of full tender documents makes it impossible to assess the practicality of the submission process, required documentation, or the overall management of the contract.
•Impossibility to assess the practicality of the bidding process due to missing documents.
•Lack of clarity on reporting, contract management, and performance monitoring mechanisms.
Data Consistency100/100
Within the provided tender snippet, the information appears consistent. The description aligns with the extracted requirements.
Sustainability0/100
The tender notice does not mention any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity for a contract of this value and duration to incorporate broader public value objectives.
•No mention of environmental sustainability criteria.
•No mention of social criteria (e.g., local employment, ethical supply chains).