Tenders

Provision of Installation and Commission of Solar PV for the University of Sunderland

Open
Deadline
26 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017393-2026
Value
£144,000
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£144,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Design, supply, installation, testing, and commissioning of solar photovoltaic (PV) system for Helen McArdle House

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for solar PV installation is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. There are no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required services (design, supply, installation, testing, and commissioning of solar PV) is clear. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and deadline. However, the critical issue of missing document content significantly hinders completeness, as bidders cannot access the full scope of requirements or tender documents.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially tight, is provided. The absence of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the lack of e-submission and the inability to access full documents detract from optimal fairness.

No e-submission
No document content available
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of e-submission and the unavailability of document content reduce practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Disclosed estimated value
Proper CPV code provided
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing document content
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential short deadline
Lack of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with clear content.
2. Specify detailed evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Consider implementing an e-submission process for improved practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline