Tenders

Portfolio Office Integrated Tool Solution

Open
Deadline
34 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017739-2026
Value
£1,600,000
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,600,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Third-party PPM product built on the Microsoft ecosystem

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an integrated tool solution is generally well-structured with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its overall clarity and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. No disputes are reported. The procedure is clearly defined as 'Open procedure'.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, specifying a 'Portfolio Office Integrated Tool Solution' built on the Microsoft ecosystem. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start date. However, the lack of accessible document content (0 documents with content/summaries) is a major gap, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for exclusion and eligibility are mentioned (though not detailed). There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission details and the lack of accessible document content significantly reduce its practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specified estimated value and contract duration
Proper CPV code provided
Open procedure for broad participation

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents accessible with content summaries or full versions.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline