Pre-Market Engagement Normanby Hall Country Park

This pre-market engagement is well-described and clear in its ambition, effectively outlining the scope for potential partners. However, it presents notable gaps in financial transparency and modern procurement practices like e-submission and explicit sustainability criteria.

Legal compliance is good for a pre-market engagement (PME). While the procedure type is 'None', this is expected for a market sounding phase. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes or suspensions. The submission period is reasonable from today's date.

The project description and the AI-extracted requirements for PME participation are very clear and unambiguous. The ambition to create a 'Signature Heritage, Hospitality and Events Destination' is well articulated. The absence of formal evaluation criteria is expected at this pre-market stage.

Completeness is moderate. Basic information, duration, and contract start date are provided, and documents are available. However, the estimated value is classified, and formal evaluation criteria are not defined, which are significant omissions from a full tender perspective, even if expected for PME.

Fairness is good. The requirements appear generic enough for a PME seeking broad expertise and do not seem tailored to a specific company. Full document access is provided, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the classified value and lack of e-submission reduce overall transparency and equal access.

Practicality is moderate. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, the absence of electronic submission support and the undisclosed estimated value pose practical hurdles for potential partners in assessing the opportunity and engaging efficiently.

Data consistency is excellent. All dates are logical and in sequence, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor gaps like the unspecified 'Liable Person' or 'Procedure Type: None' do not indicate inconsistency.

Sustainability is moderate. While the project's core mission to 'safeguard its heritage and public value' and include 'Education, interpretation' inherently touches upon social and cultural sustainability, explicit green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus are not defined in the tender documentation.