Legal Compliance75/100
As an RFI, this notice appropriately defines its purpose as early market engagement, not a formal tender. The CPV code is suitable for the services described. The 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' fields are minor data entry omissions but clarified by the description.
•Structured fields 'Type' and 'Procedure' are unpopulated, despite the description clarifying it's an RFI.
Clarity85/100
The description of the services sought, the purpose of the RFI, and the participation instructions (RFI document, market event) are exceptionally clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the RFI's intent.
Completeness70/100
Basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are provided. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a common practice for RFIs but limits supplier insight. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.
•Estimated value is not disclosed.
•The 'Liable Person' field is empty.
Fairness85/100
Full document access is provided via the Atamis portal, and the requirements are generic, focusing on capabilities rather than specific company tailoring. Deadlines for RFI submission and event registration are reasonable, ensuring equal opportunity for market input.
•Estimated value is classified, which can limit transparency for potential suppliers.
Practicality70/100
A clear document URL is provided, and the contract start date and duration are specified. While the estimated value is not disclosed, the use of the Atamis portal implies electronic submission for the RFI, enhancing practicality.
•Estimated value is not disclosed, which can make it harder for suppliers to gauge the scale of commitment required.
Data Consistency80/100
Dates are logical and consistent. Most key fields are populated, though 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are missing. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.
•Inconsistent data in 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields (marked 'None') compared to the detailed description of an RFI.
•The 'Liable Person' field is empty.
Sustainability65/100
The tender explicitly includes a strong social aspect by aiming to design a feedback model that is 'accessible, inclusive, and reflective of the full diversity of patient health journeys'. While not explicitly green or innovation-focused as a procurement criterion, the digital nature implies innovation.
•No explicit green procurement criteria are mentioned.