Tree maintenance works in the administrative territory of Tukums municipality

This tender for tree maintenance services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and an open procedure. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern impacting fairness and completeness, while sustainability aspects are notably absent.

The tender appears to comply with most legal requirements, including a reasonable submission deadline (21 days) and a clearly defined open procedure. CPV codes are appropriate, and no disputes are reported. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns regarding full compliance with transparency obligations.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements, including exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial, are well-documented and understandable, as evidenced by the AI-extracted requirements and document summaries. The award criterion ('lowest price') is explicitly stated, contradicting the automated flag.

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. Key requirements and criteria are defined across the documents. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant impediment to completeness, as bidders may not have full access to all necessary details.

The tender's estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and the 'lowest price' award criterion is objective. E-procurement is enabled, promoting equal access. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical issue that directly undermines transparency and equal access to information for all potential bidders.

Electronic submission is supported via the E-Procurement system, which is practical. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not explicitly known, and the 'Restricted document access' could create practical hurdles for bidders.

The core tender data, including key fields, dates, and financial information, is logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The automated check's flags regarding 'Missing evaluation criteria' and 'No e-submission' are contradicted by the tender's explicit information and AI-extracted requirements.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.