"IT service provision for the needs of SIA "SALDUS KOMUNĀLSERVISS""

This tender for IT maintenance services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and an objective evaluation method, but it is significantly hampered by restricted document access and inconsistencies regarding e-submission, impacting fairness and practicality.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and includes mandatory exclusion grounds, indicating adherence to national regulations. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the restricted document access is a significant legal compliance issue concerning transparency and equal treatment.

The tender description is clear, and the AI summaries indicate that requirements, technical specifications, and a contract draft are well-documented. The evaluation method ('lowest price') is specified in the technical document summary, despite a conflicting flag in the issues section.

All essential basic, financial, timeline, and classification information is provided. Requirements, criteria, and duration are defined. However, the 'restricted document access' means the full tender documentation is not completely available to all potential bidders, which is a critical gap.

The estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and the 'lowest price' evaluation method is objective. However, the 'restricted document access' is a major impediment to fairness and equal opportunity. The contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement vs. No e-submission) also raises concerns about equal access to the submission process.

The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' suggests a potential lack of electronic submission, which significantly reduces practicality. Restricted document access also creates practical hurdles for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, there is a notable inconsistency between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check result, and a minor one regarding evaluation criteria.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.