Supply and Install of Sand Storage and Filling Equipment

This tender presents a clear project scope and good practical aspects but is significantly hampered by the absence of evaluation criteria, which critically impacts clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The tender defines an open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the reveal date is missing, the liable person is not specified, and the procedure code is empty, which are minor disclosure gaps.

The project description and technical requirements are clear and detailed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue. Additionally, specific mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements are not detailed in the provided text.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are well-provided. All listed documents are available. The major deficiency is the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of specific financial requirements, which are crucial components of a complete tender.

The tender provides full document access, discloses the estimated value, and mandates electronic submission, promoting equal access. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis of assessment. The mandatory site visit deadline, while common, could pose a minor challenge for some bidders.

Electronic submission is clearly supported and mandated. The contract start date and duration are specified, and the estimated value is disclosed. While a direct document URL isn't provided in the summary, the existence of documents implies accessibility via the e-procurement portal.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the empty 'Liable Person' field, missing procedure codes, and the absence of a reveal date.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.