Legal Compliance100/100
Mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds are referenced, aligning with UK regulations. However, the lack of full tender documents and, critically, the absence of evaluation criteria pose a significant risk to legal compliance regarding transparency and equal treatment of bidders.
•Absence of full tender documents makes it impossible to verify full legal compliance.
•Missing evaluation criteria creates a risk of non-compliance with transparency and equal treatment principles.
Clarity40/100
The description of services and technical capabilities is clear and well-defined, providing a good understanding of the required scope. Nevertheless, the lack of comprehensive tender documents means that crucial details on submission format, evidence requirements, and contractual terms remain unclear.
•Lack of full tender documents leads to ambiguity regarding submission requirements and contractual terms.
Completeness83/100
The tender is fundamentally incomplete due to the complete absence of attached tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and crucially, evaluation criteria. This severely limits a bidder's ability to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer.
•No tender documents attached (e.g., ITT, specification, contract terms).
•Missing evaluation criteria, which are essential for a complete tender package.
Fairness60/100
The absence of clear evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be assessed, potentially leading to arbitrary decisions. The 'Innovation Focus' characteristic without corresponding requirements or evaluation criteria also creates an unfair expectation.
•Missing evaluation criteria directly impacts fairness and transparency.
•The 'Innovation Focus' characteristic is not supported by specific requirements or evaluation criteria, potentially misleading bidders.
Practicality40/100
While the services sought are practical, the lack of comprehensive documentation makes it highly impractical for bidders to formulate a competitive and compliant bid. The absence of an e-submission method also indicates a less practical and modern approach to procurement.
•Lack of full tender documents makes bid preparation impractical for potential suppliers.
•Absence of e-submission platform is a practical drawback in modern procurement.
Data Consistency100/100
There is good consistency between the service description and the listed technical capability requirements. However, the stated 'Innovation Focus' characteristic is inconsistent with the absence of any specific innovation-related requirements or evaluation criteria.
•Inconsistency between the 'Innovation Focus' characteristic and the lack of related requirements or evaluation criteria.
Sustainability25/100
The tender explicitly includes advice on responsible/sustainable investment policies and ESG developments as part of the service, which is a positive aspect. However, the procurement process itself does not appear to incorporate broader green or social criteria for the bidder's operations, representing a missed opportunity.
•Procurement process lacks broader green or social criteria for the bidder's own operations.