Supply of heating unit equipment

The overall quality of this tender is moderate, with significant concerns regarding restricted document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which severely undermine transparency and fairness.

Legal compliance is moderate. While the procedure type is clear, CPV code is appropriate, and the submission deadline is reasonable, the restricted document access and the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal shortcomings regarding transparency and fair competition principles.

Clarity is low due to the critical issue of missing evaluation criteria. Although the description is clear and requirements are categorized, bidders cannot understand how their offers will be assessed, making the tender process ambiguous.

The tender is moderately complete. Basic information, value, and duration are provided. However, restricted document access and the lack of defined evaluation criteria mean essential information for bidders is either unavailable or missing.

Fairness is significantly compromised. Restricted document access creates an unequal playing field, and the absence of specified evaluation criteria prevents objective and transparent assessment, making it impossible for bidders to compete fairly.

Practicality is moderate. There is a contradiction regarding e-procurement/e-submission, and restricted document access hinders bidders' ability to easily obtain necessary information. The contract start date is also not specified.

Data consistency is low due to multiple direct contradictions. Specifically, the information on e-procurement/e-submission and the presence/absence of evaluation criteria is inconsistent, leading to confusion.

Sustainability aspects are entirely absent. The tender does not include any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus, nor is it EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.