Tenders

Supply and delivery of waste bins.

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
006587-2026
Value
£3,300,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Budget
£3,300,000
Duration
24 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
65
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council wishes to award a Contract for the provision of two wheeled and four wheeled bins in a variety of sizes, 140 litre, 180 litre, 240 litre, 360 litre, 660 litre, 1100 litre and 1280 litre including spare lids, wheels and axles for the North Yorkshire Council area.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit bids by the specified deadline: 2026-03-06T16:00:00+00:00.
--Bids must address the requirements for a framework agreement.
--Bids must clearly address the supply requirements across three distinct lots.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender summaries. Bidders should refer to the full tender documents for standard public procurement exclusion criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Be capable of supplying two-wheeled and four-wheeled waste bins.
--Be capable of supplying bins in the specified sizes: 140 litre, 180 litre, 240 litre, 360 litre, 660 litre, 1100 litre, and 1280 litre.
--Be capable of supplying spare parts, including lids, wheels, and axles.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Possess the technical capability to provide waste and rubbish containers and bins, aligning with CPV category 34928480.
--Demonstrate the capability to manufacture or supply two-wheeled and four-wheeled bins.
--Demonstrate the capability to supply bins in a variety of sizes: 140L, 180L, 240L, 360L, 660L, 1100L, 1280L.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, specific ratios) are detailed in the provided summaries. Bidders should be prepared to demonstrate financial robustness commensurate with the estimated contract value of £2.75 million / 3.3 million EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
006587-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about The North Yorkshire Council's open tender for various two-wheeled and four-wheeled waste bins and spare parts.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
006587-2026_ocds_release.json

This tender seeks suppliers for two-wheeled and four-wheeled waste bins of various sizes, along with spare lids, wheels, and axles, for the North Yorkshire Council area.

Official PDF VersionPDF
006587-2026_official.pdf

The North Yorkshire Council is seeking suppliers for two-wheeled and four-wheeled waste bins of various sizes, including spare parts, under a framework agreement with an estimated value of £2.75 million.

Tender NoticeHTM
006587-2026.html

This tender notice from North Yorkshire Council invites bids for a framework agreement to supply two-wheeled and four-wheeled waste bins of various sizes (140L to 1280L), including spare parts, across three lots with an estimated total value of £2.75 million.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear description of the required goods but suffers from significant gaps in evaluation criteria and the absence of electronic submission, impacting fairness and overall process quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. While specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided summaries, it is implied they exist in the full tender documents, which is a minor oversight in the summary's completeness rather than a legal non-compliance.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender summaries.
Clarity65/100

The description of the goods and the AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous regarding what is to be supplied. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration, is provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria, a missing reveal date, and the lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary. Some metadata fields are also empty.

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing reveal date
Fairness55/100

The tender's value is disclosed, and documents are accessible. However, the absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it prevents transparency in the decision-making process. The lack of e-submission also creates barriers to equal access and efficiency.

Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. The most significant practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation for modern public procurement processes.

No e-submission
Data Consistency80/100

Key dates and financial information are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the tender type and procedure, an empty 'Liable Person' field, and a missing reveal date.

Missing codes for Type/Procedure
Empty Liable Person
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of goods and requirements
Value and duration clearly specified
Documents are available
CPV code correctly assigned
Requirements are generic and not tailored to a specific company

Concerns

Absence of evaluation criteria
No electronic submission option
Lack of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary
Some missing metadata (reveal date, liable person, procedure codes)

Recommendations

1. Include clear and objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Implement an e-submission platform to enhance accessibility and efficiency.
3. Integrate sustainability, social, and innovation aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline