Legal Compliance100/100
The tender explicitly references compliance with the Procurement Act 2023 and mandatory exclusion grounds, indicating a foundational understanding of legal requirements. However, without the full tender documents, a comprehensive assessment of legal compliance is not possible.
Clarity40/100
The tender's description and extracted requirements are generally clear regarding the framework's purpose, scope, and high-level expectations for bidders. The strategic objectives for streamlining and efficiency are well-articulated.
Completeness83/100
This is a major concern. The complete absence of any tender documents (e.g., Invitation to Tender, Selection Questionnaire) and evaluation criteria renders the tender incomplete and unbiddable. Bidders lack essential information to prepare a compliant and competitive submission.
Fairness60/100
The 'Restricted' procedure combined with the requirement for bidders to demonstrate capacity as a 'primary provider' across multiple public bodies could potentially limit competition to larger, established agencies. The absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness of the selection process.
•Potential for limited competition due to high requirements and 'Restricted' procedure.
Practicality40/100
The framework concept itself is practical for the contracting authority to achieve efficiency and consistency. However, the current state of the tender, lacking any documents, makes it entirely impractical for bidders to participate or prepare a meaningful submission.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent, with no contradictions between the description and extracted requirements.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to environmental sustainability or social responsibility, as confirmed by automated checks.