“Integrated Design, Construction Works and Author Supervision for the Renovation of the Outpatient Department at Rūpniecības iela 38, Madona, Madona Municipality, LV 4801”

This tender demonstrates good clarity in its technical requirements and supports e-procurement, but is significantly hampered by the undisclosed estimated value, restricted document access, and critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which severely impacts fairness and completeness.

The tender generally complies with basic legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines, clear procedure type, and appropriate CPV codes. However, the undisclosed estimated value and restricted document access are significant legal disclosure and transparency issues.

The description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and well-documented. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely diminishes the overall clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be judged.

Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided, and numerous detailed documents are listed. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, missing evaluation criteria, and restricted document access.

Fairness is severely compromised by the restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and the complete absence of evaluation criteria. While e-procurement is supported and requirements do not appear tailored, these fundamental transparency issues create an uneven playing field.

The tender supports electronic submission and clearly specifies the contract duration and EU funding. However, the restricted document access poses a practical barrier, and the contract start date is not specified.

Most key fields are populated, dates are logical, and no disputes are reported. The primary inconsistency is the undisclosed estimated value. There is also a minor contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag, though e-submission is assumed to be supported.

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, but it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within its requirements.