Free Community Physical Activity Service for Adults with Mental Ill Health

This tender offers a clear description of a valuable community health service. While generally well-structured, improvements in document availability and specific evaluation criteria would enhance its overall quality.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including proper CPV code and a stated procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight relative to the contract start date. No explicit disputes or regulatory compliance issues are flagged in the provided data.

The description of the service is clear and detailed, outlining the target audience, objectives, and expected benefits. Requirements are documented, though specific evaluation criteria are missing, which slightly reduces clarity on how submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and contract start date. However, the lack of access to the content of the tender documents, or even summaries, significantly impacts completeness. The absence of a reveal date is also noted.

The tender explicitly states it is an open and competitive process, not tailored to specific providers, which is a strong indicator of fairness. Full document access is implied to be available through the portal, but the lack of visible content and objective evaluation criteria diminish this score slightly. Value is disclosed.

Key practical information such as the contract start date, duration, and estimated value is provided. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission methods and financing sources limits the practicality score. The provided submission deadline, while active, appears close to the contract start.

Key fields like title, organization, reference, value, and dates are populated and appear consistent. There are no flags for suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logically ordered, with the submission deadline preceding the contract start date.

The tender does not explicitly mention any requirements related to green procurement, social aspects (beyond the service itself), or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which results in a moderate score for this category.