Legal Compliance60/100
The primary concern is the incorrect CPV code (72416000 - Application service providers) for a plasmapheresis system, which can severely hinder the visibility of this early market engagement to relevant suppliers. While it's an RFI, proper classification is crucial for market reach. The procedure type is appropriately undefined for an early engagement, and deadlines are reasonable for this stage.
•Incorrect CPV code assigned.
Clarity90/100
The purpose, scope, and requested insights for this early market engagement are exceptionally clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the description and are easy to understand. The absence of formal evaluation criteria is appropriate for an information-gathering phase.
Completeness85/100
All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location, is provided. Requirements for supplier insight are well-defined. The four associated documents are listed. The lack of formal evaluation criteria is expected for an early market engagement.
•"Liable Person" field is empty.
Fairness70/100
The requirements are generic and not tailored, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable for an RFI. However, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant drawback, potentially creating barriers for some suppliers and reducing efficiency and equal access.
•No e-submission support.
Practicality65/100
The primary practical concern is the lack of electronic submission, which can complicate the process for both the procuring entity and potential suppliers. A direct contact email is provided, which is practical for an RFI. Contract start and duration are clearly specified.
•No e-submission support.
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are largely populated, and the data presented is consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline (submission deadline before contract start) is logical for a planning phase.
•"Liable Person" field is empty.
Sustainability20/100
The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or a specific focus on innovation beyond exploring commercial models. This represents a significant missed opportunity to integrate modern sustainability and responsible procurement principles.
•No green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria.