Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined and appropriate. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the reveal date is missing, which impacts transparency. Mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary, which is a minor gap in explicit disclosure.
•Missing tender reveal date
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly detailed in summary
Clarity80/100
The tender description is clear, outlining the scope of work (media planning, buying, evaluation for healthy weight promotion). The evaluation criteria weighting (60% quality, 40% cost) is explicitly stated. AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and understandable. Specific performance conditions are not detailed in the summary but are expected in the full tender documents.
•Specific performance conditions not detailed in the provided summary
Completeness70/100
The tender includes essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and location (NUTS code). Key deadlines are specified. Documents are referenced and accessible via the Bravo portal. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the specific codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' are missing. The reveal date is also not provided.
•Missing tender reveal date
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
Fairness85/100
Full document access is provided via a public portal, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements for a 'suitably qualified and experienced agency' appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. Electronic submission is supported, ensuring equal access. The evaluation criteria weighting is transparent, though detailed quality criteria are in the full ITT document.
Practicality90/100
Electronic submission is explicitly supported via the eTenderWales Bravo portal, and the URL is provided. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Financing information (estimated value) is available. The automated check's flag 'No e-submission' contradicts the explicit instructions in the tender description and AI-extracted requirements; based on the text, e-submission is fully enabled.
•Automated check incorrectly flags 'No e-submission'
Data Consistency90/100
Key dates (submission, contract start) are logical and consistent with the stated duration. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the tender status is active. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' and an empty 'Liable Person' field.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement initiatives, social criteria, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects within the tender's scope.
•No explicit green, social, or innovation criteria
•Not EU funded