Tenders

Provision of Security Guarding Services for British Embassy Berlin- Germany

Open
Deadline
17 days left
March 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
013594-2026
Value
£1,388,535
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,388,535
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Other
62
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The requirement is for a Private Security Company (PSC) to provide physical security in the form of guards at the British Embassy, Berlin.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-20T17:00:00+00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Be a Private Security Company (PSC).
--Meet legal qualification requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Demonstrate the capability to provide physical guard services.
--Meet technical qualification requirements.
--Be capable of providing physical security services at the British Embassy in Berlin.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Meet financial qualification requirements.
--Possess the financial capacity to undertake a contract with an estimated value of 1,388,535.0 EUR over 36 months.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
013594-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS data record provides structured information about a planned procurement notice for private security guard services at the British Embassy in Berlin.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013594-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about the tender for physical security guard services at the British Embassy in Berlin, including details about the contracting authority.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013594-2026_official.pdf

This tender notice outlines the requirements for a Private Security Company to provide physical guard services at the British Embassy in Berlin, detailing the legal, financial, and technical qualification conditions for bidders.

Tender NoticeHTM
013594-2026.html

This tender notice from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office seeks a Private Security Company to provide physical guard services for the British Embassy in Berlin, with an estimated value of £1.16 million and specific legal, financial, and technical qualification requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a clear service description but suffers from significant gaps in evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission, impacting transparency and fairness. Several basic information fields are also missing or inconsistent.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines an open procedure and uses a correct CPV code. The time from today's date to the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the missing reveal date, unspecified codes for procedure type, and absence of a liable person are minor compliance shortcomings.

Missing reveal date
Missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
Clarity60/100

The core service description is clear and unambiguous. Basic eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are outlined. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity flaw, and some qualification requirements are generic.

No evaluation criteria specified
Generic 'legal qualification requirements' and 'technical qualification requirements'
Completeness70/100

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. Documents are listed as available. Nevertheless, the critical absence of evaluation criteria significantly impacts completeness. The NUTS code also appears inconsistent with the service location.

Missing evaluation criteria
NUTS code (UKI32) inconsistent with service location (Berlin)
Fairness55/100

The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a significant barrier to fair competition and transparency. Additionally, the absence of electronic submission capabilities in a modern procurement context limits equal access for potential bidders. Requirements themselves do not appear tailored.

No evaluation criteria specified
No electronic submission (e-submission)
Practicality60/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical. However, the absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

No electronic submission (e-submission)
Data Consistency65/100

Dates (submission, contract start) and financial information are consistent. However, the NUTS code UKI32 (Inner London) is inconsistent with the stated service location in Berlin, which is a significant data error. Several key fields are also unpopulated.

NUTS code (UKI32) inconsistent with service location (Berlin)
Missing 'Liable Person' and procedure codes
Sustainability20/100

The tender provides no indication of incorporating green procurement principles, social considerations, or an innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to align with modern public procurement best practices.

No green procurement aspects
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description for physical security guards
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified
Open procedure type is defined
Documents are listed as available for review
No disputes or suspensions reported

Concerns

Critical absence of specified evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission capabilities
Inconsistency between NUTS code (UKI32) and service location (Berlin)
Missing basic information fields (e.g., reveal date, liable person)
No integration of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed and objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Implement electronic submission to streamline the bidding process and enhance accessibility.
3. Correct the NUTS code to accurately reflect the service location in Berlin.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline