Organization and management of swimming training sessions for 1st-grade students of general education institutions of Jēkabpils Municipality

This tender for swimming training services demonstrates good clarity in its requirements and evaluation criteria but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern for legal compliance regarding transparency and equal treatment of bidders, potentially hindering full adherence to procurement regulations. The undisclosed estimated value is a minor transparency issue.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements, including mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, are well-defined. The evaluation criterion ('lowest price') is explicitly stated, contradicting the automated flag.

Basic information, location, and deadlines are provided. Key documents are listed with summaries, and requirements/criteria are defined. However, the estimated value and the contract duration are not disclosed, which are significant omissions for a complete tender.

The tender explicitly states 'E-Procurement' and uses an objective 'lowest price' evaluation criterion. The requirements do not appear tailored. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical barrier to fair competition and equal treatment, as bidders cannot fully review the terms. The undisclosed estimated value also reduces transparency.

Electronic submission is indicated as supported ('E-Procurement'). However, crucial practical details such as the contract start date and duration are missing. Financing information is also unavailable due to the undisclosed estimated value.

Dates are logical, and no disputes are reported. However, there are inconsistencies between the 'PROCUREMENT CHARACTERISTICS' (E-Procurement) and 'AUTOMATED CHECK RESULTS' (No e-submission), and between AI extraction/document summaries (evaluation criteria specified) and automated checks (missing evaluation criteria). The contradiction between 'Documents available' and 'Restricted document access' is also a significant consistency issue. Key fields like estimated value and contract duration are also missing.

The tender does not include any specific requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.