Worcester Event Security & Stewarding

This tender for event security and stewarding services is generally well-structured for a below-threshold competition, providing essential information and documents. However, it significantly lacks transparency regarding evaluation criteria and does not support electronic submission, hindering fairness and practicality.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. While some procedure codes are missing and a document summary appears irrelevant, the overall structure suggests compliance with national procurement regulations for a below-threshold competition.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good high-level overview of what is expected. However, the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant concern, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, and timeline, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. However, the critical absence of detailed evaluation criteria and the missing procedure codes represent notable gaps in the tender documentation.

The tender value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. Full document access is indicated. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria introduces subjectivity and potential for unfairness in the assessment process. The absence of e-submission also limits equal access for all potential bidders.

Key contract details such as start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. However, several key fields, such as 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, are unpopulated. A significant inconsistency is the summary of Document 1, which describes a completely unrelated procurement termination notice, suggesting a data error.

The tender makes no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader public policy objectives into the procurement process.