Tenders

Newbridge Leisure Centre

Open
Deadline
10 days left
March 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
018070-2026
Value
£42,000
Location
West Wales and The Valleys, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 12, 2026

Budget
£42,000
Duration
1 months
Location
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Removal and Renewal of the floor tile around the swimming pool

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for floor tile removal and renewal at Newbridge Leisure Centre is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear and concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects, along with no document content available, significantly impacts completeness.

No specific requirements provided for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, or submission
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are provided. The lack of specific tailored requirements for companies is positive. However, the absence of e-submission and detailed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair.

Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of e-submission, no document URL, and missing financing information reduce its practicality for bidders. The short submission deadline also poses a practical challenge.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Description and estimated value provided
CPV code and NUTS code specified
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission
Limited sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Specify all mandatory and desirable submission requirements, including technical and financial capabilities.
3. Consider implementing e-submission for improved practicality and efficiency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline