Tenders

Hosting Capability Supplier

Open
Deadline
30 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
011785-2026
Value
£102,000,000
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£102,000,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Other
62
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Home Office, Enterprise Networks & Infrastructure function, is preparing a Further Competition to contract a Hosting Capability supplier to provide 24/7 operational support to the Home Office’s data centres, including maintenance, engineering and service management services. This procurement which will be run via a Further Competition using CCS Framework RM6190 (Technology Services 4) Lot 6.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit bid by the deadline: 2026-04-03T00:00:00.
--Participate in a Further Competition process under CCS Framework RM6190.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be an approved supplier on the CCS Framework RM6190 (Technology Services 4) Lot 6.
--The bidder must be capable of participating in a Further Competition process as defined by the CCS Framework RM6190.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Ability to provide 24/7 operational support for data centres.
--Ability to provide maintenance services for data centres.
--Ability to provide engineering services for data centres.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial stability criteria) are explicitly stated in the provided tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Planning NoticeHTM
011785-2026.html

The Home Office is seeking a supplier from CCS Framework RM6190 (Technology Services 4) Lot 6 to provide 24/7 operational support, maintenance, engineering, and service management for its data centres, with an estimated value of £85 million.

OCDS RecordDOC
011785-2026_ocds_record.json

The Home Office is seeking a Hosting Capability supplier via a Further Competition under CCS Framework RM6190 (Technology Services 4) Lot 6 to provide 24/7 operational support, maintenance, engineering, and service management for its data centres.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011785-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides information on the Home Office's upcoming further competition to procure a Hosting Capability supplier for 24/7 operational support, maintenance, engineering, and service management for its data centres, conducted via CCS Framework RM6190 Lot 6.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011785-2026_official.pdf

The Home Office is seeking a Hosting Capability supplier via a Further Competition under CCS Framework RM6190 (Technology Services 4) Lot 6 to provide 24/7 operational support, maintenance, engineering, and service management for its data centres, with an estimated value of £85 million.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a further competition for data centre hosting capabilities under an existing framework. While the core service description is clear and essential information is provided, significant gaps exist in the explicit definition of evaluation criteria and financial requirements, impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender leverages an established framework (CCS RM6190), which implies compliance with national procurement regulations. CPV codes are appropriate, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, basic fields like 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are either empty or marked 'None', which is a data quality issue, and the 'reveal date' is missing.

Basic fields 'Type' and 'Procedure' are 'None' despite a clear description of a 'Further Competition'
'Liable Person' field is empty
Clarity60/100

The description of the required services and technical capabilities is clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location, is provided. Documents are listed. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements beyond framework membership.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific financial requirements explicitly stated
Fairness55/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are generic for the service type, not tailored to a specific company (though limited to framework suppliers, which is standard for further competitions). However, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria and the lack of an e-submission option significantly undermine fairness and equal access.

No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency
No e-submission option
Practicality60/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing information (estimated value) is available. The primary practical drawback is the absence of electronic submission, which can hinder efficiency and accessibility for bidders.

No e-submission option
Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency70/100

Dates are logical and there are no disputes or suspensions. However, there are inconsistencies in the basic information fields ('Type', 'Procedure', 'Liable Person') and a minor discrepancy in the estimated value between the structured data (EUR) and document summaries (GBP).

Inconsistency in 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields vs. description
'Liable Person' field is empty
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a lack of integration of sustainability criteria into the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects mentioned

Strengths

Clear description of required services
Use of an established framework (CCS RM6190) for pre-qualified suppliers
Key timeline and financial information (value, duration, start date) provided
CPV code is appropriate

Concerns

Absence of explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of specific financial requirements
No electronic submission option
Inconsistencies in basic fields (Type, Procedure, Liable Person) and estimated value currency/amount
No sustainability, social, or innovation criteria

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish all evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide explicit financial requirements or clarify how financial stability will be assessed within the framework.
3. Implement an e-submission platform for improved practicality and equal access.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline