Tenders

NUN - Riversley Park Revival Nuneaton - Main Contractor Work for Park Redevelopment

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
012391-2026
Value
£1,440,000
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 08, 2026

Budget
£1,440,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire
Type
Other
61
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The project aims to enhance accessibility and usability for cyclists and pedestrians in the park by constructing a new cycle path from George Elliot Gardens (in the North) through to the Nuneaton Museum & Art Gallery (to the South; also known as Melly Square). The project has been split into the following phases/ sections: 1. George Elliot Gardens. 2. The Underpass. 3. Melly Square. Traditional single stage JCT D&B Contract 2024. Further information in terms of programme, specification, designs and survey information is contained in the tender documentation pack.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the bid by the deadline: March 6, 2026, 12:00:00 UTC.
--The submission must include a price proposal, which will account for 60% of the evaluation.
--The submission must include a quality proposal, which will account for 40% of the evaluation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender notice information. Bidders should refer to the full tender documentation for these.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of acting as a Main Contractor.
--Bidders must be willing to contract under a Traditional single stage JCT Design & Build Contract 2024.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate capability in building demolition, wrecking work, and earthmoving work (CPV 45110000).
--Demonstrate capability in constructing new cycle paths.
--Demonstrate capability to manage and deliver a project split into phases (George Elliot Gardens, The Underpass, Melly Square).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Demonstrate financial capacity to undertake a project with an estimated value of £1.2 million (or 1.44 million EUR).
--Ability to provide a competitive price proposal for evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
012391-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council's open tender for the construction of a new cycle path to enhance accessibility in the park, detailing project phases and contract type.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012391-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council's open tender for constructing a new cycle path to enhance accessibility in the park, outlining project phases and the contracting authority.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012391-2026_official.pdf

This tender notice from Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council invites main contractors for the Riversley Park Revival project, involving the construction of a new cycle path with an estimated value of £1.2M, and details an extended submission deadline of March 6, 2026, with evaluation based on 60% price and 40% quality.

Tender NoticeHTM
012391-2026.html

This is a tender notice for the main contractor work on the Riversley Park Revival project in Nuneaton, involving the construction of a new cycle path, and it includes the submission deadline.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

61
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a clear project scope but suffers from significant gaps in detailed evaluation criteria and a lack of modern e-submission capabilities, impacting fairness and clarity. Its sustainability integration is minimal.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally appears compliant with national regulations for a below-threshold open competition. The procedure type and CPV codes are defined, and deadlines are reasonable. However, specific codes for the procedure type are missing, and mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided summary, requiring reference to full documentation.

Missing specific codes for procedure type
Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in summary
Clarity60/100

The project description and general requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, a significant clarity issue exists as the detailed evaluation criteria for the 40% quality component are not specified in the provided information, making it difficult for bidders to formulate a targeted quality proposal.

Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria
Completeness65/100

Most essential information, such as title, organization, value, duration, and location, is present. Nevertheless, the tender lacks detailed quality evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary, and some administrative codes for the procedure type. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in summary
Fairness50/100

While the value is disclosed and requirements seem generic, two major issues impact fairness. Firstly, the absence of e-submission creates a barrier to equal access for potential bidders. Secondly, the lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria reduces transparency and objectivity in the assessment process.

No electronic submission support
Lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria
Practicality55/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for both bidders and the contracting authority.

No electronic submission support
Data Consistency70/100

Key dates are logical and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, some fields like 'Liable Person' are empty, and specific codes for the procedure type are missing. There is also an internal contradiction in the provided data regarding the presence of evaluation criteria, which has been interpreted as missing *detailed* criteria.

Empty 'Liable Person' field
Missing specific codes for procedure type
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly integrate green procurement, social clauses (beyond the inherent project outcome), or innovation-focused criteria into its requirements. This indicates a low emphasis on broader sustainability objectives within the procurement process itself.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Value and key timelines (duration, start date) are specified
Appropriate CPV code assigned
Open competition procedure for transparency
OCDS data provided for structured information

Concerns

Lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria
No electronic submission support
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary
Some administrative fields (e.g., Liable Person, procedure codes) are incomplete

Recommendations

1. Provide comprehensive and detailed quality evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and objectivity.
2. Implement an e-submission platform to facilitate equal access and streamline the bidding process.
3. Integrate explicit sustainability, social value, and innovation criteria into the tender requirements where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline