PLA25163 Provision of Lighting Installations for Bay of Lights Illumination Trail

This tender presents a clear service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in completeness and clarity regarding evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds, impacting fairness and overall quality.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and there are no active disputes. However, minor omissions such as missing codes for the procedure type, an empty 'Liable Person' field, and a missing reveal date slightly detract from full legal disclosure.

The description of the required service is clear and unambiguous. However, the tender explicitly lacks details on mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria, which creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration is provided. Nevertheless, critical information such as full mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are noted as missing. The failure to download one tender document also represents a gap in completeness.

The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern, as it hinders transparency and the ability of bidders to prepare competitive proposals, potentially leading to subjective assessment. The lack of electronic submission and the failed document download also negatively impact equal access for all potential suppliers.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The failed download of one document and a slight inconsistency in the stated contract duration (21 months vs. '2+1 period') also reduce practicality for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no active disputes or suspensions. However, some fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty, and there is an inconsistency between the stated contract duration (21 months) and the description's '2+1 period' (typically 36 months).

The tender mentions a focus on an 'innovative' lighting solution, which is a positive aspect. However, it explicitly lacks any green procurement criteria or social aspects, which are increasingly important for comprehensive sustainability in public procurement.