Legal Compliance75/100
The tender, identified as a preliminary market engagement notice, clearly defines its purpose, which aligns with pre-procurement best practices. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. While formal procedure type/code is 'None', this is acceptable for a market engagement stage.
Clarity90/100
The description of the project, its aims, scope, and the required expertise areas are exceptionally clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the detailed text, making the expectations for market engagement participants very understandable.
Completeness85/100
The notice provides all basic information, including title, reference, organization, duration, and location. Crucially, it includes extensive links to previous development work, offering valuable context. While the estimated value is classified and formal evaluation criteria are absent, this is typical for a market engagement notice.
Fairness80/100
Full document access is provided, and the requirements for expertise are generic, not appearing tailored to a specific company. The classified value reduces transparency, and the absence of e-submission could limit equal access for some potential participants.
•Value classified
•No e-submission
Practicality60/100
The lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback. While the contract start date and duration are clear, the undisclosed estimated value makes it challenging for potential suppliers to gauge the project's scale and allocate resources effectively for their market engagement responses.
•No e-submission
•Estimated value not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are consistently populated, and all dates provided (submission, contract start, and reference dates for previous work) are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating a stable procurement context.
Sustainability40/100
The notice does not explicitly include green procurement or social criteria. While the project itself involves innovation in data collection methodology, this is inherent to the service being procured rather than a specific sustainability criterion for the procurement process.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria