Legal Compliance75/100
Legal compliance is moderate, as the 'planning' status explains some omissions. However, the absence of a defined procedure type and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are significant concerns for the eventual formal tender.
•Procedure type not defined
•No mandatory exclusion grounds specified
Clarity80/100
The description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity gap for a formal tender, hindering potential bidders' understanding of how proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. While requirements are outlined at a high level, critical elements such as the formal procedure type, liable person, and detailed evaluation criteria are missing, consistent with its 'planning' status.
•Liable person not specified
•Procedure type not defined
Fairness65/100
The requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, and the value is disclosed. However, the absence of evaluation criteria significantly impacts transparency and objectivity, and the lack of e-submission support reduces equal access for all potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission support
Practicality65/100
Key practical details like contract start date, duration, and estimated value are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support presents a notable practical hurdle for bidders.
Data Consistency90/100
The data provided is largely consistent and logical, with no apparent contradictions or disputes. The few missing fields are attributable to the tender's 'planning' status rather than data inconsistency.
Sustainability70/100
The core service of providing youth activities inherently addresses significant social aspects of sustainability. While lacking explicit green procurement or innovation criteria, its fundamental social focus is a strong positive.
•Not explicitly green procurement
•No explicit innovation focus