Pieriga, Latvia
€139,980
February 04, 2026 at 10:00
Other
163879
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for mobile communication services is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but significant concerns exist regarding restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and transparency.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and no disputes are reported. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' are critical legal compliance issues, as they hinder transparency and fair competition.
The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and refer to specific documents. Nevertheless, the absence of explicitly specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. While documents are listed, the 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' mean that essential components of a complete tender package are not fully available or defined.
The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' are major impediments to fairness and transparency. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' also raises concerns about equal access.
The tender specifies 'E-Procurement' and an electronic opening place, suggesting electronic submission, but this is contradicted by an automated check flag. No explicit document URL is provided, and the contract start date is not specified, creating practical hurdles for bidders.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting information regarding e-submission functionality.
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, indicating a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability objectives.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes