Supply, Installation, and Maintenance of CCTV System

This tender presents a clear project description but suffers from significant deficiencies in documentation, fairness, and transparency, notably the absence of evaluation criteria and restrictive eligibility requirements.

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and the potentially restrictive regional preference for a below-threshold tender raise compliance questions. Essential documents like 'Schedule 1' are referenced but not provided, hindering full legal assessment.

The core description of the CCTV system replacement and desired features (IP-based, ANPR, enhanced coverage options) is clear. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the need to request 'Schedule 1' and plans significantly reduce overall clarity for prospective bidders.

While basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and the non-provision of essential documents ('Schedule 1', plans). Furthermore, one listed document is a 'Page not found' error.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the absence of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective assessment. The eligibility requirements (UK-based SME/VCSE, preferably North East) are restrictive and could limit competition. The lack of e-submission and the requirement to request key documents also create barriers to equal access.

The tender lacks electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The need for bidders to manually request critical documents (plans, Schedule 1) and the 'Page not found' error for an attachment also indicate practical inefficiencies.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a notable inconsistency in the estimated value, stated as '200,000.00 EUR' in financial information but '£200,000' in the description. Some procedure codes and the liable person field are also empty.

The tender shows minimal focus on sustainability. There are no explicit green procurement criteria, social aspects (beyond the VCSE eligibility), or innovation requirements beyond a standard technology upgrade.