Provision of Public Space CCTV: Cameras and Management Software

This tender demonstrates good foundational quality with clear requirements and transparent financial details, but is notably hampered by the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a contradiction regarding e-submission.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a clear reveal date is a minor transparency concern, though the submission deadline itself is not assessed as per instructions.

The description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be judged.

Basic information, financial details, duration, and location are well-provided. All listed documents are available. The primary deficiency is the lack of defined evaluation criteria, which is a crucial component of a complete tender package.

The tender offers full document access, discloses the estimated value, and lists generic requirements that do not appear tailored. While 'E-Procurement' is a characteristic, the automated check indicates 'No e-submission', which, if true, could hinder equal access. The absence of evaluation criteria also impacts transparency and fairness.

The tender lists 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic, yet the automated check explicitly states 'No e-submission', which is a significant practical drawback if true. The contract start date is not specified, and a direct document URL is not provided, though access is implied.

Most key fields are populated, dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the empty 'Liable Person' field.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.