United Kingdom26 days leftOpen

Framework for Section 12 Doctors

Tender Overview

LOCATION

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

VALUE

£480,000

DEADLINE

February 28, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

85110000

REFERENCE

010000-2023

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The establishment of a recognised open framework for the provision of Section 12 Mental Health Doctors.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are provided in the tender information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must be capable of providing Section 12 Mental Health Doctors.
  • The bidder must be a recognized provider of Section 12 Mental Health Doctors.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidder must demonstrate the capacity to provide Section 12 Mental Health Doctors for a 36-month contract duration.
  • The bidder must be able to operate within an open framework structure established by Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance, financial stability) are provided in the tender information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bids must be submitted by the final deadline of 2026-02-28 12:00:00.
  • Bidders should adhere to the submission process for an open framework, noting the initial submission deadline was 2023-05-05.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF010000-2023_official.pdf
Summary:
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council is establishing an open framework for the provision of Section 12 Mental Health Doctors, with the first submission deadline on 5th May 2023.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is critically incomplete due to the complete absence of tender documents and essential procurement information, making it practically impossible for bidders to submit a compliant offer and posing significant risks to the contracting authority.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Legal compliance is severely compromised by the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria. The vague eligibility requirements also lack objective legal basis.

No mandatory exclusion grounds specified.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Clarity40/100

The tender lacks clarity across all critical aspects due to the complete absence of tender documents. Key requirements are vaguely defined, leaving significant room for interpretation.

No tender documents provided, leading to complete lack of clarity on scope, terms, and process.
Vague definitions for 'capable,' 'recognized provider,' and 'capacity' in eligibility and technical requirements.
Completeness83/100

The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any attached documents, detailed specifications, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria renders it fundamentally flawed.

Zero documents attached, making the tender incomplete.
No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance) are provided.
Fairness80/100

Fairness is undermined by the lack of objective criteria, particularly the 'recognized provider' requirement, which could be subjective or tailored. The absence of evaluation criteria also prevents a transparent and fair assessment of bids.

Requirement for a 'recognized provider' is subjective and lacks objective criteria, potentially limiting competition or being tailored.
Absence of evaluation criteria makes fair and transparent assessment impossible.
Practicality40/100

From a practical standpoint, this tender is unworkable for potential bidders as there are no documents to guide their submission. For the contracting authority, the lack of financial checks and clear requirements presents high operational and financial risks.

Bidders cannot practically prepare a compliant bid without tender documents, specifications, or evaluation criteria.
Lack of financial requirements poses a significant risk to the contracting authority regarding bidder stability and capability.
Data Consistency100/100

While basic information is consistent, the mention of an 'initial submission deadline was 2023-05-05' alongside a 'final deadline of 2026-02-28' for an 'open framework' requires further clarification within the missing tender documents to ensure full understanding of the framework's operation.

The interplay between the 'initial submission deadline' (2023-05-05) and the 'final deadline' (2026-02-28) for an 'open framework' needs clearer explanation in the tender documents.
Sustainability0/100

There is no indication of any green, social, or innovation criteria being considered in this procurement, which is a missed opportunity for broader public value.

No green procurement criteria specified.
No social criteria specified.

Strengths

Basic information (title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, duration) is clearly provided.
The purpose of establishing an open framework for Section 12 Mental Health Doctors is clearly stated.
The open procedure type generally promotes competition.

Concerns

Critical absence of any tender documents, making the tender unworkable.
Missing mandatory exclusion grounds, a fundamental legal requirement.
Absence of evaluation criteria, preventing transparent and fair assessment.
Vague and potentially restrictive eligibility requirements (e.g., 'recognized provider') lacking objective criteria.
No specific financial requirements, posing significant risk to the contracting authority.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and a clear evaluation methodology.
2. Clearly define and include all mandatory and discretionary exclusion grounds as per relevant procurement regulations.
3. Revise eligibility and technical requirements to be objective, measurable, and proportionate, providing clear criteria for 'recognized provider,' 'capable,' and 'capacity.'

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
70/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes