Water supply and domestic wastewater main networks at Rūdolfa Blaumaņa Street 2, Sigulda, within the red lines

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but its transparency and fairness are significantly impacted by restricted document access and ambiguity regarding evaluation criteria.

The procedure type, CPV code, and submission deadline are clearly defined and compliant. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern for transparency and full legal compliance with public access principles.

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and refer to specific documents for detail. However, conflicting information regarding the explicit presence and clarity of evaluation criteria reduces the overall clarity.

Basic information, estimated value, duration, and location are all provided. Nevertheless, 'Restricted document access' is a major completeness issue, as it prevents full access to all tender documents. The ambiguity around evaluation criteria also affects completeness.

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical fairness issue, creating barriers for potential bidders. The ambiguity regarding evaluation criteria also undermines transparency and equal treatment. The contradiction concerning e-submission further impacts fairness.

There is a contradiction regarding e-submission support ('E-Procurement' characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' flag), which impacts the practicality of submitting bids. The contract start date is not explicitly specified, though duration is.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are notable contradictions regarding e-submission support and the explicit presence/clarity of evaluation criteria, which reduce data consistency.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often encourages higher sustainability standards.