Request for Information - Extra Care Housing - Malton

This Request for Information (RFI) is clear in its purpose of market engagement for future supported accommodation, but it exhibits notable deficiencies in data completeness and the absence of electronic submission capabilities.

While the RFI itself is not a formal tender and thus avoids many strict legal compliance issues, the published record has gaps. The 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields are missing or marked 'None', and the reveal date is absent, which are data quality and transparency concerns for the public record.

The RFI's purpose is exceptionally clear and well-articulated. The description and AI-extracted requirements precisely define what information is sought and why, which is crucial for effective market engagement. The absence of evaluation criteria is appropriate for an RFI.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, duration, and documents are provided. However, the 'Liable Person' is missing, and the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are unpopulated, indicating some administrative incompleteness.

The RFI's intent to understand the market broadly and its generic requirements suggest a fair approach to information gathering. However, the lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant barrier to equal access and participation for potential contractors, impacting overall fairness.

The absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for interested contractors. While key dates and duration are specified, the lack of modern submission methods reduces practicality.

Key dates such as submission deadline, contract start, and duration are logical and consistent. However, the missing 'Liable Person', 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'reveal date' introduce inconsistencies in the overall data record.

The RFI does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social criteria for contractors, or an innovation focus in its requirements. While the project itself addresses a significant social need, the procurement process does not leverage sustainability principles.