Harrogate Convention Centre Royal Hall Lighting Upgrade

This tender provides essential project details and documentation but is significantly hampered by the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission, impacting transparency and accessibility. It also notably omits any sustainability or social considerations.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. The 30-day period from today's date to the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the absence of explicit details on mandatory exclusion grounds and the missing reveal date are minor compliance gaps.

The project description is clear, but the tender significantly lacks specified evaluation criteria, which is a critical omission. Additionally, the financial stability and previous experience requirements are somewhat vague, lacking specific metrics or examples.

Basic information, value, duration, and location are provided, and all listed documents are available. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the high-level nature of the AI-extracted requirements, which lack detailed specifications.

While the tender value is disclosed and documents are accessible, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the process. Furthermore, the lack of an electronic submission option creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access for potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, increasing administrative burden for bidders. The summary also does not explicitly provide a direct document URL.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. A minor inconsistency exists between the estimated value in EUR (396,000) and the GBP equivalent (£330,000) mentioned in the document summaries. Also, 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty.

The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate modern sustainability and responsible procurement practices.