Legal Compliance75/100
The tender is in a 'planning' status, indicating it's a market engagement notice (PIN/RFI). In this context, the absence of a formal procedure type and detailed legal grounds (exclusion/eligibility) is acceptable, as these would be defined in a subsequent formal tender. The CPV code is correctly assigned, and there are no disputes.
•Procedure type not defined
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Clarity80/100
The description and technical requirements, including the AI-extracted details, are exceptionally clear, comprehensive, and unambiguous for a market engagement notice. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a significant clarity gap if this were a formal tender.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, estimated value, duration, and detailed technical requirements are provided. However, critical elements for a formal tender, such as eligibility, financial, and exclusion criteria, as well as evaluation criteria, are explicitly stated as missing, which is typical for a market engagement phase.
•No specific eligibility requirements detailed
•No specific financial requirements for bidders detailed
Fairness85/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and the market engagement period (40 days) is reasonable for preparation. The technical requirements, while specific, appear to be performance-based and not overtly tailored to a single company. However, the lack of evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission are drawbacks for transparency and equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission supported
Practicality65/100
Key practical details such as contract start date, duration, and estimated value are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical deficiency in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden.
•No electronic submission supported
Data Consistency90/100
Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated, and the 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' are consistent with the 'planning' status of a market engagement notice.
•Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly seeks a 'next-generation solution' and focuses on advanced capabilities, demonstrating a strong innovation focus. However, it explicitly lacks any green procurement criteria or social aspects, which are increasingly important in public procurement.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria