Acquisition of a burner set with delivery and replacement for the boiler plant at Kieģeļu Street 14, Jēkabpils

This tender demonstrates good data consistency and clear basic information, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements regarding procedure type, CPV code, and general disclosure. The submission period is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern for transparency and compliance with public access principles, even if summaries are provided.

The tender description and categorization of requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are clear. However, the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their offers will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, deadlines, and location is well-provided. All listed documents are summarized. The primary gap is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which is crucial for a complete tender package.

The tender benefits from e-procurement and disclosed value, promoting equal access. However, 'Restricted document access' and the absence of clear, objective evaluation criteria severely undermine fairness and transparency, potentially disadvantaging bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. The contract duration is specified. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and explicit document URLs (beyond the system itself) slightly reduces overall practicality.

All essential fields are populated, and the data provided (e.g., dates, counts) is logical and consistent, indicating a well-structured data entry.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it EU-funded. This is common for smaller, technical procurements, resulting in a neutral score.