Technical maintenance, repair, and supply of spare parts for elevators for the needs of SIA “RĒZEKNES SLIMNĪCA”

This tender for lift maintenance services exhibits significant concerns regarding document accessibility and data consistency, severely impacting fairness and practicality for potential bidders, despite clear basic information and a reasonable submission deadline.

The tender defines an open procedure with a reasonable submission deadline and correct CPV code. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a major legal compliance issue for an open procedure, as it violates transparency principles and hinders equal access to information. The contradiction regarding evaluation criteria also raises compliance concerns.

The tender's title, description, and AI-extracted requirements are clear. However, the 'Restricted document access' severely compromises overall clarity for potential bidders, as critical information within the tender documents is not readily available. The conflicting information about evaluation criteria further reduces clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, CPV, and NUTS code is complete. While documents are listed, the 'Restricted document access' means the tender is not fully complete for public access, which is a critical aspect of completeness for an open procedure. The ambiguity around evaluation criteria also impacts completeness.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, 'Restricted document access' is a critical fairness issue, preventing equal access to essential tender information for all potential bidders. The potential lack of clear and accessible evaluation criteria further undermines the transparency and objectivity of the process.

The contract duration and estimated value are clearly specified. However, 'Restricted document access' makes it practically impossible for bidders to prepare and submit a compliant bid. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag also creates uncertainty regarding the actual submission method, impacting practicality.

While key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are significant contradictions. These include 'Restricted document access' for an 'open' procedure, 'No evaluation criteria specified' versus the document summary stating their presence, and 'E-Procurement' characteristic conflicting with 'No e-submission'. These inconsistencies severely undermine the reliability of the tender information.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a low score for this category.