Maintenance and repair of the management and automation system regulations in the facilities of the state joint-stock company “Valsts nekustamie īpašumi”

This tender presents a well-structured procurement for maintenance services with clear basic information and an open procedure, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access which severely impacts fairness, completeness, and legal compliance.

The tender specifies an open procedure and adheres to WTO/GPA, indicating a commitment to broad competition, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the critical issue of 'Restricted document access' for essential tender documents, including technical specifications and evaluation criteria, represents a significant breach of transparency and legal compliance requirements for public procurement.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized, pointing to specific documents for detailed information. Performance conditions are clearly linked. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag means that while the structure for clarity exists, the actual content may not be accessible to bidders, thus undermining overall clarity in practice.

All basic information, financial details, and timeline elements are provided. The tender lists necessary documents, and their summaries indicate that requirements and criteria are defined. The 'Required: No' for the technical specification is unusual. The primary concern for completeness is the 'Restricted document access,' which means bidders cannot fully access all necessary information to prepare a complete bid.

The open procedure and e-procurement characteristic promote fairness. The value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a severe impediment to fairness, as it prevents all potential bidders from having equal access to critical information, including detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, making the process non-transparent and potentially biased.

The tender supports e-procurement, which enhances practicality for bidders. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of a specific contract start date and the 'Restricted document access' could pose practical challenges for bidders in planning and preparing their submissions.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, there are inconsistencies between the automated check results ('Missing evaluation criteria', 'No e-submission') and the tender's explicit characteristics ('E-Procurement', Document 3 summary stating evaluation criteria are present).

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also noted as not being EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.