Legal Compliance100/100
The tender is critically non-compliant due to the complete absence of tender documents, mandatory exclusion grounds, and evaluation criteria. These are fundamental requirements under public procurement law, making the process legally unsound.
•Absence of all tender documents, making the tender non-compliant and impossible to participate in.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds, which are a fundamental legal requirement for public procurement.
Clarity40/100
While the description of the service and the open flexible framework structure is conceptually clear, the complete absence of tender documents means there is no detailed clarity on specifications, terms, conditions, or the actual application process for bidders.
•Lack of detailed specifications and terms and conditions due to missing documents.
•Unclear application process and requirements without supporting tender documents.
Completeness83/100
The tender is severely incomplete due to the total absence of all tender documents. This includes detailed specifications, contract terms, evaluation criteria, and application forms. Furthermore, specific financial requirements and sustainability criteria are missing.
•Complete absence of all tender documents (specifications, contract, forms, etc.).
•Missing specific financial requirements for bidders.
Fairness80/100
The absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness of the process, as there are no objective standards for bid assessment. The lack of financial requirements could also lead to unfair competition or risks for the contracting authority.
•Absence of evaluation criteria, preventing fair and objective assessment of bids.
•Lack of specific financial requirements, potentially leading to unfair competition or risks from financially unstable providers.
Practicality40/100
The tender is entirely impractical for potential bidders as there are no documents, instructions, or evaluation criteria available to prepare and submit a compliant bid. This makes participation impossible.
•Impossible for bidders to prepare and submit a bid due to the complete absence of tender documents and instructions.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided basic information regarding the open flexible framework, its duration, and value is internally consistent. The commencement date of 2023 for a framework still open for applications until 2027 is consistent with an open framework model. However, the lack of documents prevents verification of consistency with a full tender package.
Sustainability0/100
There is no mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus within the provided information. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.
•Absence of green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.