Legal Compliance100/100
The tender lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and crucial tender documents, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement. The absence of evaluation criteria also raises significant legal concerns regarding transparency and equal treatment.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Absence of tender documents
Clarity40/100
While the project description outlines the scope of work reasonably well, the overall clarity is severely compromised by the complete absence of tender documents, detailed requirements, and evaluation criteria. Bidders cannot fully understand expectations.
•No detailed requirements beyond description
•Absence of evaluation criteria
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. The complete absence of tender documents, including terms of reference, contract drafts, and detailed technical specifications, makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer.
•No tender documents attached
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness60/100
The lack of tender documents, especially evaluation criteria, creates a significant risk to fairness and equal treatment among bidders. Without clear rules for assessment, the process can be perceived as arbitrary or biased, potentially favoring pre-selected bidders.
•Absence of evaluation criteria compromises fair assessment
•Lack of documents creates information asymmetry
Practicality40/100
The requirement for bidders to request surveys and the lack of full documentation will create practical hurdles for potential suppliers, increasing their effort and potentially deterring participation. The provisional sum approach for Stage 2 costing also adds complexity.
•Surveys available 'upon request' adds administrative burden
•Provisional sum approach for Stage 2 costing is complex without clear hourly rate definitions and assumed hours
Data Consistency100/100
Based on the provided snippet, there are no explicit inconsistencies. However, the lack of full documentation means that potential inconsistencies within the broader tender package cannot be assessed.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not include any specific green procurement or social criteria, which is a missed opportunity to promote sustainability objectives within the project.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria